MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2001455432 · doi:10.1159/000288990

Alexithymia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2010· article· en· W2001455432 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychotherapy and Psychosomatics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlexithymiaUlcerative colitisToronto Alexithymia ScaleInflammatory bowel diseaseInternal medicineDiseaseGastroenterologyCrohn's diseasePsychologyMedicinePsoriasisClinical psychologyPsychiatryImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purported association between alexithymia and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was investigated in a group of 112 IBD patients (89 with ulcerative colitis and 23 with Crohn's disease) using the well-validated 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Alexithymia was assessed also in a group of 112 normal subjects matched for gender, age, and education. The IBD group was significantly more alexithymic than the control group, and no significant difference was found between the ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients. Alexithymia was unrelated to the duration of illness and the level of disease activity. Although the rate of alexithymia in the IBD group (35.7%) was significantly higher than the rate in the control group (4.5%), it is lower than rates of alexithymia that have been found among psychiatric patients with disorders that also have been linked theoretically and clinically with alexithymia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it