Background subtraction using finite mixtures of asymmetric Gaussian distributions and shadow detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Foreground segmentation of moving regions in image sequences is a fundamental step in many vision systems including automated video surveillance, human-machine interface, and optical motion capture. Many models have been introduced to deal with the problems of modeling the background and detecting the moving objects in the scene. One of the successful solutions to these problems is the use of the well-known adaptive Gaussian mixture model. However, this method suffers from some drawbacks. Modeling the background using the Gaussian mixture implies the assumption that the background and foreground distributions are Gaussians which is not always the case for most environments. In addition, it is unable to distinguish between moving shadows and moving objects. In this paper, we try to overcome these problem using a mixture of asymmetric Gaussians to enhance the robustness and flexibility of mixture modeling, and a shadow detection scheme to remove unwanted shadows from the scene. Furthermore, we apply this method to real image sequences of both indoor and outdoor scenes. The results of comparing our method to different state of the art background subtraction methods show the efficiency of our model for real-time segmentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".