Full interseismic locking of the Nankai and Japan‐west Kurile subduction zones: An analysis of uniform elastic strain accumulation in Japan constrained by permanent GPS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We analyze permanent Global Positioning System (GPS) data obtained over Japan between 1995 and 1997 to estimate the instantaneous interseismic coupling ratio of the seismogenic zones due to the subduction of the Pacific and Philippine Sea plates below the Japanese islands. We first derive the GPS strain rate fields that characterize the crustal deformation of southern and northern Japan and invert them to determine the effective subduction velocity along the central Nankai trough on one side and the Japan‐west Kurile trench on the other. These “reference free” velocities are close to those predicted by plate motion models with respect to Eurasia. We conclude that the Eurasian reference frame gives a good approximation to the subduction motion and that to first order, both subduction zones were fully locked during the period of measurements. We then test whether the coupling ratio shows local variations within the seismogenic zones. To do this, we divide the subduction interface into 35 km×30 km elements that we model by point source groups, and we invert the GPS velocity field referenced to Eurasia to derive the coupling ratio (between 0 and 1) on each fault element. The results are coherent over the 3 years and confirm that both the central Nankai and the Japan‐west Kurile seismogenic zones are homogeneously fully locked. Most of the coupling ratios are close to 1 and a few are close to 0; intermediate values are rare. The zones of decoupling correspond either to strong postseismic afterslip associated with the 1994 Sanriku‐Oki interplate earthquake (Japan trench) or to a small overestimation of the actual lower limit of the locked zone. We conclude that within the resolution of the GPS data and the model, (1) partial coupling did not exist during these 3 years along the Nankai and Japan‐west Kurile trenches; (2) the small seismic coupling ratio previously derived from earthquakes analysis for the Japan and Kurile trenches may indicate that a significant part of the elastic energy is dissipated silently through slow earthquakes and postseismic afterslip; and (3) the heterogeneous coseismic slip pattern observed for the large and great earthquakes that rupture both subduction zones is in great contrast to the homogeneous loading. Finally, we discuss the nonelastic residual deformation within the frame of the long‐term deformation of the Japanese islands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".