MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002114917 · doi:10.1177/1088767901005002004

Visions of Gender and Third-Party Reactions to Homicide Offenders

2001· article· en· W2002114917 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHomicide Studies · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntimate Partner and Family Violence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser Valley
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomicidePsychologyCriminologyVisionSocial psychologySuicide preventionPoison controlInjury preventionSociologyMedicineMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using an experimental narrative approach, this study examines the effect of victim-offender gender on reactions to homicide offenders in domestic and bar situations. Quantitative findings suggest that respondents viewed a woman who killed a man in a bar as less guilty than offenders in some other gender-combination conditions. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the guilt assessment assigned to a woman who killed a man or to a man who killed a woman in a bar. Yet, in open-ended comments, respondents consistently described the men, whether defendants or victims, involved in fights with women in the bar in a highly negative manner. The other experiment revealed no significant differences in reactions to women and men who killed spouses at home. Our findings offer some support for both equality and leniency perspectives depending on the exact nature and gender combination of the homicide situation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it