MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002475145 · doi:10.1109/61.924819

Comparing direct and synthetic tests for interruption of line-charging capacitive current

2001· article· en· W2002475145 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical Fault Detection and Protection
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircuit breakerElectrical engineeringCapacitive sensingProspective short circuit currentVoltageElectrical impedanceDirect currentLine (geometry)Current (fluid)EngineeringWaveformArc-fault circuit interrupterPower (physics)Short circuitPower factorConstant power circuitPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a validated arc model, this paper analyzes current distortion and voltage waveforms during both direct and synthetic tests for interruption of line-charging capacitive current by power circuit breakers. Although the voltage of the electric arc drawn between breaker contacts may produce significant current distortion, it is demonstrated that the most significant parameter affecting the breaking capacity of power circuit breakers in capacitive-current switching tests is the voltage jump appearing across breaker contacts immediately after current interruption. It is essential to correctly define the supply circuit impedances and the associated voltage jump so as not to reduce or increase this test severity unduly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it