MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002505380 · doi:10.1109/nabic.2012.6402253

Incorporating a Genetic Algorithm to improve the performance of Variable Neighborhood Search

2012· article· en· W2002505380 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariable neighborhood searchMetaheuristicMemetic algorithmMathematical optimizationLocal search (optimization)Computer scienceJob shop schedulingGuided Local SearchPopulationEvolutionary algorithmGenetic algorithmVariable (mathematics)AlgorithmMathematicsSchedule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Variable Neighborhood Search (VNS) is an efficient metaheuristics in solving optimization problems. Although VNS has been successfully applied on various problem domains, it suffers from its inefficient search exploration. To improve this limitation, VNS can be joined with a population-based search to benefit from its search exploration. In this article, a Memetic Algorithm (MA) is proposed which is based on a Genetic Algorithm (GA) incorporating VNS as a local search method. To evaluate the proposed method, it has been applied on the classical Job Shop Scheduling Problem (JSSP) as a well-known optimization problem. The experimental results show that the proposed MA outperforms the VNS method. Furthermore, compared to the state-of-the-art Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) proposed to solve JSSP, the proposed method offers competitive solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicScheduling and Optimization AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207