Effectiveness of the Suzuki−Miyaura Cross-Coupling Reaction for Solid-Phase Peptide Modification
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Suzuki-Miyaura (SM) cross-coupling reaction has recently become one of the most efficient methods for C-C bond construction opening a wide range of opportunities in organic synthesis. This study focused on the evaluation of the use of the SM reaction to modify peptides using a solid-phase synthesis approach, an avenue that was still not investigated intensively. We used as a peptide model [Ala (1,2,3), Leu (8)]Enk linked to a polystyrene support on which it was previously assembled. The aromatic residues Tyr (4) and Phe (7) of [Ala (1,2,3), Leu (8)]Enk were respectively substituted with p-iodo-Phe, and an SM-related strategy was developed. Results indicated that the reaction conditions involving K 3PO 4 or Na 2CO 3 (base), DMF (solvent), Pd(PPh 3) 4 (catalyst), and temperatures ranging from 50 to 80 degrees C during 20 h were found as optimal. Finally applying those optimal conditions, a series of [Ala (1,2,3), Leu (8)]Enk analogs modified at Tyr (4) or Phe (7) positions was synthesized using diverse boronic acid derivatives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it