MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002654445 · doi:10.1260/1351010011501696

Empirical Prediction of Speech Levels and Reverberation in Classrooms

2001· article· en· W2002654445 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBuilding Acoustics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReverberationEmpirical modellingComputer scienceLinear regressionIntelligibility (philosophy)Linear predictionPredictive modellingSpeech recognitionAcousticsSimulationMachine learningPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the development of empirical models for predicting total A-weighted speech levels and 1-kHz early-decay times in classrooms in an arbitrary state of occupancy. These are the two main quantities that affect speech intelligibility in classrooms. Three models for predicting early-decay time were developed. One was based on determining the contributions of various surface features to the average classroom-surface absorption coefficients. The other models, and those for predicting speech levels, were developed using multi-variable linear-regression techniques, and data previously measured in university classrooms or predicted empirically. By way of evaluation, the models were shown to re-predict the average values of the measured quantities in the original data-set with high accuracy, but they tended to underestimate the variability in the data. Predictions are presented to illustrate the performance of the models in the case of small and large hypothetical classrooms with low and high surface absorption, when unoccupied and occupied. The results are consistent with those measured in real classrooms. In particular, the speech-level model predicts physically-realistic decreases with distance from a speaker to a listener. The experimental data has also been used to determine typical ‘effective’ absorption coefficients for three classroom features – carpeted floors, absorbent ceilings and upholstered seating on carpeted floors – data which indicates the real-world performance that can be expected of these features, which may be useful in other prediction models and, for example, which provides information on the choice of treatments to meet the requirements of standards.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it