MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002890621 · doi:10.1093/hsw/27.4.274

Social Work in Restructuring Hospitals: Program Management Five Years Later

2002· article· en· W2002890621 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth & Social Work · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestructuringSocial workChampionAccountabilityWork (physics)Public relationsSociologyManagementPolitical scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hospital restructuring in North America has involved re-engineering, downsizing, reorganizing, and remodeling of traditional hierarchical functional organizations into multisite programmatic conglomerates. The implications for professional disciplines have been dramatic in that departments such as social work have been dismantled and social work practice has come under the domain of program managers representing multiple disciplines. In this study 12 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, that were studied in the early stages of restructuring in 1995 expanded to 22 sites by 1999. The effect of the mergers and moves to program management on the social work profession was examined. The key findings are that social work line positions were not lost, but accountability and recruitment were no longer in the hands of the discipline. These findings suggest that it is more critical now than ever for social workers to champion their contributions to health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it