Low cost permanent fault detection using ultra-reduced instruction set co-processors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a new, low hardware overhead solution for permanent fault detection at the microarchitecture/instruction level. The proposed technique is based on an ultra-reduced instruction set co-processor (URISC) that, in its simplest form, executes only one Turing complete instruction --- the subleq instruction. Thus, any instruction on the main core can be redundantly executed on the URISC using a sequence of subleq instructions, and the results can be compared, also on the URISC, to detect faults. A number of novel software and hardware techniques are proposed to decrease the performance overhead of online fault detection while keeping the error detection latency bounded including: (i) URISC routines and hardware support to check both control and data flow instructions; (ii) checking only a subset of instructions in the code based on a novel check window criterion; and (iii) URISC instruction set extensions. Our experimental results, based on FPGA synthesis and RTL simulations, illustrate the benefits of the proposed techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it