MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003214741 · doi:10.1109/icif.2010.5711958

Efficient delay-tolerant particle filtering through selective processing of out-of-sequence measurements

2010· article· en· W2003214741 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle filterAlgorithmParticle (ecology)Computer scienceFilter (signal processing)Sequence (biology)Tracking (education)Auxiliary particle filterComputational complexity theoryArtificial intelligenceEnsemble Kalman filterComputer visionKalman filter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel algorithm for delay-tolerant particle filtering that is computationally efficient and has limited memory requirements. The algorithm estimates the informativeness of delayed (out-of-sequence) measurements (OOSMs) and immediately discards uninformative measurements. More informative measurements are then processed using the storage efficient particle filter proposed by Orguner et al. If the measurement induces a dramatic change in the current filtering distribution, the particle filter is re-run to increase the accuracy. Simulation experiments provide an example tracking scenario where the proposed algorithm processes only 30-40% of all OOSMs using the storage efficient particle filter and 1-3% of OOSMs by re-running the particle filter. By doing so, it requires less computational resources but achieves greater accuracy than the storage efficient particle filter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it