MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003779450 · doi:10.1080/14927713.2011.649111

“I'm just like I always was”: a phenomenological exploration of leisure, identity and dementia

2011· article· en· W2003779450 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueLeisure/Loisir · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMental Health and Patient Involvement
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaIdentity (music)PhotovoiceContext (archaeology)Interpretative phenomenological analysisPsychologyPhenomenology (philosophy)Qualitative researchDevelopmental psychologyGerontologySociologyMedicineDiseaseAestheticsSocial scienceEpistemologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Both negative discourse surrounding dementia and changes that occur from an illness causing dementia can threaten identity. While research shows that identity remains in dementia, little is known about the role leisure plays in identity work in the dementia context. The purpose of this study was to explore the role of leisure in maintaining identity in early-stage dementia. Four participants with dementia living in the community participated in this interpretive phenomenological study. Through multiple interviews, participant observation and photovoice, conducted over several months with each participant, we found that while participants experienced many threatening assaults on identity, leisure served as an important space to uphold identity and remain engaged in life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.459
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.038 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it