MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003787220 · doi:10.1002/cem.665

An index formalism that generalizes the capabilities of matrix notation and algebra to n‐way arrays

2001· article· en· W2003787220 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemometrics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicTensor decomposition and applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKorea Institute of Energy Research
KeywordsNotationFormalism (music)Algebra over a fieldComputer scienceMatrix (chemical analysis)Context (archaeology)Matrix algebraTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsArithmeticPure mathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The capabilities of matrix notation and algebra are generalized to n‐way arrays. The resulting language seems easy to use; all the capabilities of matrix notation are retained and most carry over naturally to the n‐way context. For example, one can multiply a three‐way array times a four‐way array to obtain a three‐way product. Many of the language's key characteristics are based on the rules of tensor notation and algebra. The most important example of this is probably the incorporation of subscript/index‐related information into both the names of array objects and the rules used to operate on them. Some topics that emerge are relatively unexplored, such as inverses of n‐way arrays; these might prove interesting for future theoretical study. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it