MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003934940 · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-11-00148.1

The Resident-as-Teacher: It's More Than Just About Student Learning

2011· article· en· W2003934940 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Linda Snell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Graduate Medical Education · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInnovations in Medical Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical educationTask (project management)PsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Docere, the Latin root of the word doctor, means to teach, and teaching is an intrinsic part of being a physician. Most physicians routinely teach their students, residents, colleagues, and patients. Residents regularly contribute to the education of medical students and their fellow residents and may spend up to one-fourth of their time supervising, instructing, and evaluating students and junior colleagues.1 Teaching by residents is different from, and likely complementary to, that of their attending staff and faculty. Residents tend to teach (1) different things (bedside skills and patient management rather than factual knowledge),2 (2) in a different way (as near-peer teachers); and (3) at different times (teaching while on-call). The impact of effective resident teaching goes beyond medical students and includes effects on patients but has particular benefits for the residents themselves and the systems in which they work and learn.Medical students benefit greatly from having residents as teachers: it has been estimated that nearly one-third of their learning in the clinical setting comes from residents.1 As near-peer teachers, residents are close enough to the students they teach to understand the optimal approach for them to learn.3 Residents also are “consciously competent,” that is, they still can deconstruct performance on a clinical task and articulate the detailed steps to facilitate learning by novices and advanced beginners. Beyond that, residents are important role models for their junior colleagues,4,5 and students likely acquire professional values and behaviors from their resident supervisors.Resident teaching has other positive effects on students. Highly rated resident-teachers increase student satisfaction. The study by Huynh and colleagues6 in this issue shows that positive experiences with resident-teachers and a perceived high quality of resident education is associated with high overall satisfaction with a clerkship rotation. Medical students' career choice has also been linked with good resident teaching in surgery.7There are also effects on the residents themselves: Those who teach have increased enthusiasm for teaching and greater job satisfaction.5 In addition, residents who are more successful or higher-rated teachers tend to have better knowledge acquisition.1,8 There may thus be some truth to Joseph Joubert's adage “to teach is to learn twice.”9Residents with effective teaching skills may also have a positive effect on patient care. Resident involvement in teaching activities has been shown to have a positive effect on the resident's communication skills,3 and good patient communication skills have been associated with better clinical outcomes.8.10Given these benefits of teaching by residents, a concern raised by the Huynh and colleagues6 study is that the residents did not address all the learning objectives of the medical students. It is not clear whether that is a generalizable finding or related to reduced teaching on particular topics in the program studied. The authors' recommendation is for programs to ensure residents are prepared to teach in all the common content areas and key competencies needed by the students.From a systems perspective, teaching is one of the skill domains in competency frameworks, such as that of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada or the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, which form the basis of residency education and accreditation requirements.11,12 Recognizing the critical role of resident teaching skills, the North American undergraduate medical education accreditation body requires programs and resources “to enhance the teaching and assessment skills of residents.”13(p14)The findings of Huynh and colleagues6 underscore that residents need formal instruction, support, and mentoring to enhance their teaching skills. Guidance on how to build an effective resident-as-teacher program has been published.4 Excellent programs exist and have been shown to improve residents' teaching skills14 and clinical knowledge.1,8 Resident-as-teacher programs appear to do more than this and have positive effects on medical student perceptions of their clerkships. We can only encourage that these programs continue to be studied and become available to all trainees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0110.017
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0070.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Graduate Medical EducationSame topicInnovations in Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207