MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004223129 · doi:10.1080/00221340701849799

GloVis as a Resource for Teaching Geographic Content and Concepts

2008· article· en· W2004223129 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geography · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeography Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Army Corps of Engineers
KeywordsContent (measure theory)Resource (disambiguation)Computer scienceMathematics educationPsychologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract Teachers of geography and related topics across a range of educational levels benefit from convenient access to graphic materials that illustrate key geographic information and concepts. GloVis (Global Visualization Viewer) is an online tool designed by the U.S. Geological Survey to facilitate archival searches for Landsat and related imagery. GloVis preview images provide a resource for teachers who wish to illustrate geographic concepts in the context of landscapes local to their institutions. This article introduces instructors to GloVis and offers classroom examples illustrating a variety of applications. Specific examples, including Virginia's physiographic provinces, regional phenological changes, New Orleans observed before and after Katrina, surface-mined landscapes in eastern Kentucky, and suburban sprawl along Virginia's I-95 corridor, illustrate the capabilities of this resource. Key Words: teachingGloVisremote sensinglandscapeLandsatgeography Acknowledgement The author acknowledges the contributions of three anonymous reviewers, and the comments provided by Mr. Tim Beckmann, Science Applications International Corporation, USGS/EROS Center for Earth Resources Observation & Science, Sioux Falls, South Dakota. R. Sivanpillai, R. W. Morrill, and L. W. Carstensen were generous with respect to the time they devoted to review of the manuscript and the useful suggestions they offered. James B. Campbell, Ph.D., is professor of geography at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Virginia, USA, where he teaches remote sensing, quantitative methods, and geomorphology. He has worked closely with students and faculty in allied fields, including forestry, geology, agronomy, and environmental sciences. Since 1997 he has served as codirector of Virginia Tech's Center for Environmental Applications in Remote Sensing (CEARS). He is author of several books, including Introduction to Remote Sensing, now in its fourth edition, widely used at universities in the U.S., Canada, and overseas, as well as numerous technical articles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score0.776

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it