MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004361303 · doi:10.2118/137480-ms

Application of the Ensemble Kalman Filter for Characterization and History Matching of Unconventional Oil Reservoirs

2010· article· en· W2004361303 on OpenAlexafffund
Saneej B. Chitralekha, Japan Trivedi, Sirish L. Shah

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsEnsemble Kalman filterKalman filterReservoir simulationMonte Carlo methodCovariancePermeability (electromagnetism)Computer scienceReservoir modelingCovariance matrixData assimilationUncertainty quantificationExtended Kalman filterPorosityPetroleum engineeringAlgorithmMathematicsEngineeringMachine learningStatisticsArtificial intelligenceMeteorologyGeotechnical engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recently, the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) has emerged as an effective tool for performing continuous updating of petroleum reservoir simulation models. The method is firmly grounded on the theory of Kalman filters and sequential Monte Carlo techniques. The ability of the method to sequentially update the spatial properties in petroleum reservoir models, such as permeability and porosity, by integrating the dynamic production data makes it a very attractive approach. Moreover, the method takes into account the production uncertainty in the reservoir models by using error covariance matrices for the measurement vector (Production and injection rates, Gas-Oil ratio, Steam-Oil ratio, etc.) and the state vector (pressure, saturation, permeability, porosity). Similar to the traditional Kalman filter, the covariance matrices have to be tuned to reflect the uncertainty in the model and the measurements. We consider two unconventional oil reservoir models: 1) highly heterogeneous black-oil reservoir model, and 2) heterogeneous SAGD reservoir model. The results will demonstrate the advantage of using the localized EnKF for effective history matching using ensemble sizes relatively lower than what otherwise would be required with the ordinary EnKF. The results will also show the advantages of using prior knowledge available from the wells (permeability and porosity measurements) to generate initial realizations. One of the main practical advantages of history matching using the EnKF over traditional optimization based approaches is its low computational effort. The computational cost is dominated by Monte Carlo simulation of the ensemble of models only. Thus, significant computational time saving is possible by running each of the ensemble simulations on independent processors in a parallel mode. Moreover, the method can be easily integrated with any commercial reservoir simulation software.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207