MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004405234 · doi:10.2118/149397-ms

New Type Curves for Analyzing Horizontal Well With Multiple Fractures in Shale Gas Reservoirs

2011· article· en· W2004405234 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Unconventional Resources Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)University of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimensionless quantityGeologyFracture (geology)Flow (mathematics)Oil shaleHydraulic fracturingType (biology)MechanicsShale gasGeotechnical engineeringPetroleum engineeringGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract To produce economically from most shale gas plays, horizontal wells (cased or open hole) with multiple fractures are the most popular choice for completing the wells. A number of well-performance behaviors can be seen for these wells depending on reservoir behavior and induced hydraulic-fracture geometry. In this paper, conceptual models for well/reservoir/hydraulic fracture combinations are first presented. Next, we discuss the impact of various reservoir types/induced hydraulic-fracture geometries upon the sequence of flow-regimes that could be encountered for shale gas reservoirs. In addition, we develop and present new sets of dimensionless type-curves for one of the conceptual models. The newly developed type curves in this study yield more unique results than those presented previously. With these dimensionless type curves, the early linear flow (early-time half slope) and boundary-dominated flow (late-time unit slope) fall on top of each other and the transition between these two regimes depends on the geometry of the reservoir and completion. Using the type curves as a guide, we then present the flow regimes that are expected for different values of horizontal well length, number of fractures, length of the fractures and spacing between horizontal wells. We also present a new method for evaluating the contribution from the outer reservoir (beyond the fracture length). Finally, using the characteristics of new dimensionless parameters and the new type-curve set, we present a simple and practical procedure for long-term forecasting in multi-fractured horizontal wells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it