MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004415363 · doi:10.1159/000191327

Growth Hormone Therapy in Turner Syndrome – Current Uncertainties and Future Strategies

2009· review· en· W2004415363 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHormone Research · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurner syndromeOxandroloneEstrogen therapyGrowth hormoneMedicineDemographyRetrospective cohort studyPediatricsHormone therapyEstrogenInternal medicineHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of growth hormone (GH) on short-to-medium-term growth in girls with Turner syndrome is well-established. However, it is only relatively recently that final height data have become available. This paper reviews 10 reports from Europe (including Sweden, Austria, France, Holland, Belgium and Scotland), Canada, USA and Japan, on final height and near-final height in girls with Turner syndrome receiving GH therapy. An improvement in final height outcome versus projected adult height was found in all the studies, except for the Scottish study, in which the median final height was only 142.6 cm, and the Canadian study, in which the projected adult height was unexpectedly high at 148.2 cm. Although the mean final height was 150 cm or greater in six studies, all 10 showed considerable individual variation in final height with minimum values ranging between 131.5 and 145 cm. These results must be interpreted cautiously since the mean age of starting treatment was relatively late at 9.1-13.1 years. However, the overall modesty and interpatient variability of response to GH in Turner syndrome, and continuing uncertainty as to the role of oxandrolone and the timing of estrogen therapy, emphasizes the need for further research. National and international collaboration in both retrospective and prospective studies are necessary to achieve sufficient data to offset the large number of variables to be analysed. In the UK, the British Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes hopes to do a retrospective meta-analysis of final/near-final height outcome, comparing this with midparental and maternal height, as well as projected height and control data. A prospective study with GH dose standardized at 30 IU/m2 per week in the form of daily injections, with randomization to receive oxandrolone or not at 9 years, and estrogen at either 12 or 14 years, is also planned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it