MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004477219 · doi:10.4296/cwrj2702191

Local and Regional Trends in Monthly Maximum Flows in Southern British Columbia

2002· article· en· W2004477219 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlood mythClimatologyGeographyEnvironmental scienceReturn periodHomogeneousClimate changePhysical geographyHydrology (agriculture)GeologyMathematicsArchaeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential impact of climate change on the hydrologic regime is an important topic in contemporary hydrology.A number of studies have been conducted to identify climate change signals in annual maximum flood records.However less attention has been paid to changes in the regime of flood events of smaller return periods.The overall trend observed in annual maximum flood records gives limited information about intra-annual changes in the hydrological regime of extreme flows.The trends in monthly maximum flows at local and regional scales in a hydro-climatologically homogeneous region from a 1A-year common observation period are explored in this study.tends are identified using the Mann-Kendall non-pafametric test with a modification for auto-correlated data.The regional significance of trends identified at the 1ocal scale is evaluated by means of a regional bootstrap algorithm that preserves the regional cross-correlation structure.Regional average magnitudes of the trend in monthly maximum flows from a comrrlon observation period are estimated over the selected region by means of the ordinary block kriging technique and are compared with results obtained from annual maximum flood records.The results show significant changes in the intraannual monthly maximum flow regime in southern British Columbia.RESUME Les r6percussions dventuelles du changement climatique sur le rdgime hydrologique constituent un thdme important de l'hydrologie contemporaine.Un certain nombre d'6tudes ont 6t6 men6es pour cerner les indices de changement climatique dans les enregistrements de crues maximales annuelles.Cependant, une attention moins grande a 6t6 port6e aux changements touchant le rdgime des inondations des p6riodes de retour plus courtes.La tendance globale observ6e pour les enregistrements de crues maximales annuelles fournit des donn6es limit6es iL propos des changements intra-annuels du

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it