MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004705718 · doi:10.1149/1.1515279

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Non-Thickness-Limited Anodic Films on Tantalum

2002· article· en· W2004705718 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAnodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
FundersNational Research Council of Science and Technology
KeywordsTantalumAnodizingTransmission electron microscopyAmorphous solidMaterials scienceElectrolyteLayer (electronics)AnodeElectrochemistryChemical engineeringNanotechnologyMetallurgyElectrodeChemistryAluminiumCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-thickness-limited (NTL) growth of anodic films on tantalum is a remarkable recently reported phenomenon whereby anodic films can be formed on tantalum to high thickness due to a change in the film growth mechanism from the usual high-field type of process. The present work employs transmission electron microscopy to reveal the structure, composition, and morphology of an NTL-type film formed by anodizing tantalum at in 10 wt % dibasic potassium phosphate/glycerol electrolyte at 453 K. A relatively compact, amorphous layer of NTL-type film material, composed of essentially tantala, was formed above an inner layer of usual high-field-type tantala under the selected conditions of anodizing and drying of the electrolyte. The field for growth of NTL-type film material is compared with for high-field growth. Thus, the thickness of the inner layer is approximately equal to the product of the formation ratio for usual anodic tantala and the final anodizing voltage. © 2002 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it