MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sphere Decoding for MIMO Systems with Newton Iterative Matrix Inversion

2013· article· en· W2004771101 on OpenAlexaff
Yi Wang, H. Leib

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOInitializationDecoding methodsAlgorithmComputer sciencePhase-shift keyingInversion (geology)Iterative methodQAMQuadrature amplitude modulationLossless compressionMathematicsControl theory (sociology)Mathematical optimizationTelecommunicationsBit error rateData compressionChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work considers the application of Newton's iterative method of matrix inversion for reducing the complexity of calculating the unconstrained solution in Sphere Decoding (SD) for Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) wireless communication systems. This paper also proposes a simpler initialization procedure for Newton's method. It is shown that as the size of the MIMO system increases, it becomes more tolerant to errors in the unconstrained solution for SD, and hence it requires a smaller number of Newton iterations. For a 16 × 16 MIMO system with QPSK or 16-QAM we show that 7 iterations are sufficient to ensure lossless SD performance. With only 4 iterations, a QPSK 32 × 32 MIMO system exhibits less than 0.1 dB performance loss relatively to SD employing the exact unconstrained solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207