MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sphere Decoding for MIMO Systems with Newton Iterative Matrix Inversion

2013· article· en· W2004771101 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOInitializationDecoding methodsAlgorithmComputer sciencePhase-shift keyingInversion (geology)Iterative methodQAMQuadrature amplitude modulationLossless compressionMathematicsControl theory (sociology)Mathematical optimizationTelecommunicationsBit error rateData compressionChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work considers the application of Newton's iterative method of matrix inversion for reducing the complexity of calculating the unconstrained solution in Sphere Decoding (SD) for Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) wireless communication systems. This paper also proposes a simpler initialization procedure for Newton's method. It is shown that as the size of the MIMO system increases, it becomes more tolerant to errors in the unconstrained solution for SD, and hence it requires a smaller number of Newton iterations. For a 16 × 16 MIMO system with QPSK or 16-QAM we show that 7 iterations are sufficient to ensure lossless SD performance. With only 4 iterations, a QPSK 32 × 32 MIMO system exhibits less than 0.1 dB performance loss relatively to SD employing the exact unconstrained solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.744

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it