MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004782477 · doi:10.1109/hicss.2010.58

An n-Gram Based Approach to Multi-Labeled Web Page Genre Classification

2010· article· en· W2004782477 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAuthorship Attribution and Profiling
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersKillam Trusts
KeywordsComputer scienceWeb pagen-gramClassifier (UML)PopularityArtificial intelligenceSupport vector machineInformation retrievalSet (abstract data type)Precision and recallWorld Wide WebLanguage model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The extraordinary growth in both the size and popularity of the World Wide Web has created a growing interest not only in identifying Web page genres, but also in using these genres to classify Web pages. The hypothesis of this research is that an n-gram representation of a Web page can be used effectively to automatically classify that Web page by genre, even when the Web page belongs to more than one genre. Experiments are run on a multi-labeled data set using both an SVM classifier and a distance function classification model. These n-gram based methods had very high precision results but somewhat lower recall results, indicating that the genre labels assigned by the classifiers are quite accurate, but that these machine learning classifiers are not assigning as many labels as did the human classifiers. The classification results compare favorably with those of other researchers on the same data set.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAuthorship Attribution and ProfilingFrench-language works237,207