MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004791083 · doi:10.1016/j.crte.2008.01.001

Interactions between vegetation and climate variability: what are the lessons of models and paleovegetation data

2008· article· en· W2004791083 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComptes Rendus Géoscience · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTree-ring climate responses
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersEuropean Science Foundation
KeywordsVegetation (pathology)GeographyClimate changePhysical geographyClimatologyForestryEcologyGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The climate reconstruction by using pollen data is classically done by statistical methods. The use of a conceptual model of niches show a few weaknesses of this approach which is not enough supported by causal relationships. A solution is to take into account ecophysiological processes through a mechanistic model. On the one hand, these models help to test the biases that can bring some changes in the distribution of the extremes, and, on the other hand, they help to understand the effect of some external constraints such as the concentration of the atmospheric CO 2 . At a shorter time scale, dendrochronological series are useful to test the response of the Aleppo pine to a warming combined to a stronger water stress. This approach is facilitated by the use of vegetation models used in inverse mode or with climatic scenarios. This paper illustrates that purpose through several examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it