MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2004918350 · doi:10.1081/qen-120020778

Applying Real-Time Statistical Process Control to Manufacturing Processes Exhibiting Between and Within Part Size Variability in the Wood Products Industry

2003· article· en· W2004918350 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuality Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAdvanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatistical process controlControl chartProcess (computing)Process variationVariation (astronomy)EngineeringVariance (accounting)Process controlSampling (signal processing)Industrial engineeringControl (management)Statistical analysisComputer scienceManufacturing engineeringStatisticsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsAccounting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a control charting procedure to monitor average part size, as well as between and within part size variation for sawn lumber in an automated lumbermill. We present a review of the sawing process followed by a discussion of sampling methods for a real-time noncontact laser measuring device. A statistical model based on the components of variation analysis of variance model is proposed both for the analysis of the data and the construction of control charts that can be used to monitor the process. The details of the resulting statistical process control system are developed and an example from the lumber industry is provided and compared to other possible approaches. The resulting techniques may have applicability in many other industries where within and between variation in processes occurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.129
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.129
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it