MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005150998 · doi:10.1680/macr.11.00164

Heat damage of steam curing on the surface layer of concrete

2012· article· en· W2005150998 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMagazine of Concrete Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicBuilding materials and conservation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialCuring (chemistry)SorptivityMoistureSurface layerCementLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In practice, the quality of concrete cover and the homogeneity of concrete are very important factors for the performance of structural concrete elements. Thus a series of experiments is carried out to investigate the excessive heat-damage effect of steam curing on the exposed surface layer of concrete in this study. Measures to prevent heat damage are also proposed. Results indicate that, due to the heat-damage effect caused by elevated temperature, there is a larger gradient distribution in the pore structure and water sorptivity between the exposed surface and the interior of the steam-cured concrete compared to normal-cured concrete. Using a moisture fabric sheet can effectively reduce such damage. The heating effect at elevated temperatures during the steam curing period results in excessive deformation of the exposed surface layer of concrete and thus more damage of the microstructure for the exposure surface than for the interior of the concrete.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it