MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005171389 · doi:10.1080/17449850802000522

“No longer a memoirist but a voyeur”: Photographing and narrating Bombay in Salman Rushdie's<i>The Ground Beneath Her Feet</i>

2008· article· en· W2005171389 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Postcolonial Writing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativePoliticsNegotiationHomelandRepresentation (politics)HistoryRelation (database)SociologyGender studiesArtLiteratureLawPolitical scienceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines the relationship between photography and narration in Salman Rushdie's 1999 Rushdie, Salman. 1999. The Ground Beneath Her Feet, London: Cape. [Google Scholar] novel The Ground Beneath Her Feet in order to consider the changing representation of Bombay in the author's work. In this novel, Rushdie places a photographer‐narrator at the centre of his attempts to negotiate tensions between aesthetics and politics, offering a renegotiation of the relationship between the migrant and his homeland which has been a central concern of his work thus far. I suggest that Rai's photography enables Rushdie to establish a relationship between his changing representational strategies, his own altered position in relation to his place of birth, and the social transformations taking place within Bombay. At the same time, Rushdie positions the crisis in Rai's narration of Bombay as a strategic act of resistance to the rise of exclusionary politics within that city during the 1990s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it