MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005257110 · doi:10.1109/isit.2007.4557546

M-user Gaussian Interference Channels: To Decode the Interference or To Consider it as Noise

2007· article· en· W2005257110 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed Abolfazl Motahari, Amir K. Khandani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterference (communication)Computer scienceGaussianChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmTransmission (telecommunications)Noise (video)Gaussian noisePolynomialDecoding methodsSimple (philosophy)Iterative methodInterference alignmentTelecommunicationsTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsMIMOArtificial intelligencePhysicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We address data transmission over the M-user Gaussian interference channel, where users send data using single Gaussian codebooks. We first present a polynomial-time algorithm for finding the maximum decodable subset among interfering users, provided the users' rates and powers are given. Given any ordering of users, we characterize an achievable rate vector in which users' rates are successively maximized based on the ordering. It is also shown that in a noncooperative scenario where users refuse to send below their conservative rates, there are achievable vectors that are feasible with respect to the conservative rates vector which can be obtained by using a simple iterative algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207