MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005391439 · doi:10.3138/md.2012-s75

Redressing the Black Crook: The Dancing Tableau of Melodrama

2012· article· en· W2005391439 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Drama · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheater, Performance, and Music History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRealmMusicalSpectacleArtLiteratureSingingVirtueAestheticsDancePhilosophyHistoryEpistemologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: This article claims that modern musical theatre began when dancers transformed the static tableaux of melodrama into episodes of singing and dancing. Though static, the melodramatic tableau had long been understood as suggesting incipient action; the musical distinguished itself generically by realizing this potential energy. The tableau vivant and the pose plastique had already laid the groundwork by deploying women’s bodies to depict the melodramatic realm of ideality upon which melodrama focused. However, while melodrama valorized the arresting of a woman’s body, the musical celebrated instead her performing power. It is precisely this use of women’s bodies simultaneously as signifier of a mythic realm of melodramatic virtue and as eroticized yet empowered spectacle that creates the musical’s affective disintegration. This genealogy demands that we reconsider the role of The Black Crook in theatre history, since it links the traditions of melodrama, posing entertainments, and musical theatre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it