MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2005521008 · doi:10.1145/1067915.1067923

Instantaneous current modeling in a complex VLIW processor core

2005· article· en· W2005521008 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveformComputer scienceOscilloscopeCurrent (fluid)Superposition principleEnergy consumptionElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringDetectorTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Measuring and modeling instantaneous current consumption or current dynamics of a processor is important in embedded system designs, wireless communications, low-energy mobile computing, security of communications, and reliability. In this paper, we introduce a new instruction-level based macromodeling approach for instantaneous current consumption in a complex processor core along with new instantaneous current measurement techniques at the instruction and program level. Current consumption and voltage supply waveforms of a processor core were acquired by a sampling oscilloscope through an external interrupt-based setup. Accurate measurements of current, power and energy consumption at the instruction, block, or program level were obtained from analyzing the stored current and voltage waveforms. The current simulation methodology uses elementary functions called atomic functions to approximate the instantaneous current consumption at the instruction level. Based on these atomic functions, a simulated instantaneous current waveform at the program level was built. First, a base waveform of the current simulation was generated by the use of four basic current superposition principles. Secondly, a final waveform of the simulated current was generated from the base waveform by applying a factorial adjustment as a function of the instruction parallelism and sequencing. Step-by-step modeling procedures with numerical examples are presented. The model captured 98% of the variation of the instantaneous current for six complex applications, with an average RMS error of less than 2.2% of the average measured mean. Energy estimates obtained by the use of the simulated current waveforms were within 1.4% of the measured values. This research is important, since for the first time highly accurate instruction-based models of instantaneous current and power for complex processor cores have been developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it