MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Jovens empreendedores e o processo de criação de empresas

2008· article· pt· W2005990370 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie · 2008
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMO Grande parte das novas empresas é criada por jovens empreendedores com menos de 35 anos, mas pouco se conhece sobre as especificidades desse grupo de empreendedores. Este artigo contribui para a compreensão do processo de criação de empresas pelos jovens empreendedores ao apresentar e analisar a criação de 89 empresas fundadas por jovens de 18 a 34 anos e compará-las com as de 99 empresas criadas por empreendedores de 35 anos ou acima. Os resultados apontam que: 1. na maior parte dos casos, os jovens criam suas empresas em equipe; 2. eles começam com um capital inicial menor que os empreendedores de 35 anos ou mais; 3. eles precisam atravessar um processo de criação que dura, em média, mais de dois anos; 4. eles desempenham funções em todas as áreas da administração - funções para as quais têm pouca ou nenhuma formação e experiência anterior à criação da empresa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it