Relaxed Most Negative Cycle and Most Positive Cut Canceling Algorithms for Minimum Cost Flow
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents two new scaling algorithms for the minimum cost network flow problem, one a primal cycle canceling algorithm, the other a dual cut canceling algorithm. Both algorithms scale a relaxed optimality parameter, and create a second, inner relaxation. The primal algorithm uses the inner relaxation to cancel a most negative node-disjoint family of cycles w.r.t. the scaled parameter, the dual algorithm uses it to cancel most positive cuts w.r.t. the scaled parameter. We show that in a network with n nodes and m arcs, both algorithms need to cancel only O(mn) objects per scaling phase. Furthermore, we show how to efficiently implement both algorithms to yield weakly polynomial running times that are as fast as any other cycle or cut canceling algorithms. Our algorithms have potential practical advantages compared to some other canceling algorithms as well. Along the way, we give a comprehensive survey of cycle and cut canceling algorithms for min-cost flow. We also clarify the formal duality between cycles and cuts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it