Three-Dimensional Analysis of Geogrid-Reinforced Soil Using a Finite-Discrete Element Framework
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three-dimensional analysis of soil-structure interaction problems considering the response at the particle scale level is a challenging numerical modeling problem. An efficient framework that takes advantage of both the finite- and discrete-element approaches to investigate soil-geogrid interactions is described in this paper. The method uses finite elements to model the structural components and discrete particles to model the surrounding soil to reflect the discontinuous nature of the granular material. The coupled framework is used in this study to investigate two geotechnical engineering problems, namely, strip footing over geogrid-reinforced sand and geogrid-reinforced fill over a strong formation containing void. The numerical model is first validated using experimental data and then used to provide new insights into the nature of the three-dimensional interaction between the soil and the geogrid layer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it