MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006563298 · doi:10.1049/cp.2009.1117

Calculations in 3D of the magnetic fields generated by distribution networks

2009· article· en· W2006563298 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Conference Publications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTransportation Systems and Safety
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverhead (engineering)Magnetic fieldElectrical conductorElectric power transmissionComputer scienceElectrical engineeringVault (architecture)Carry (investment)Field (mathematics)PhysicsTelecommunicationsEngineeringStructural engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Utility workers carry out live working on overhead and underground distribution networks on a regular basis. These networks carry high currents and can generate relatively high magnetic fields. In order to assess the exposure of utility workers to these magnetic fields we have performed 2D and 3D calculations of the magnetic field surrounding complex overhead structures and inside cable vaults. For currents up to 400 A in the conductors of overhead structures, the volumes where the magnetic field exceeds 420 μT are small and do not extend very far from the conductors. This is also the case for the magnetic field generated by the cables inside an underground cable vault. The only exception to this finding is the rising pole structure. (4 pages)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it