Numerical Study of the Effect of Cold Air Vent Flow on the Convective Heat Transfer Rate From a Hot Window Covered by a Top-Down, Bottom-Up Plane Blind System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In summer when the air-conditioning system is in use cool air from a floor-mounted vent located beneath a window often flows over the warm window. The presence of a blind system over the window will, in general, influence the effect of the vent flow on the convective heat transfer rate from the window. The effect of a Top-Down, Bottom-Up plane blind system and a cool air vent flow on the heat transfer rate from a recessed window has therefore been numerically studied here. The actual situation considered in this study is an approximate model of real situations. The window is represented by a plane isothermal section recessed into the wall, this window section being hotter than the room air far from the window. The floor-mounted vent is assumed to be located against the wall and to have a uniform discharge velocity which is normal to the vent surface. The flow has been assumed to be two-dimensional, i.e., the effect of the window and vent width has not been considered. The flow has been assumed to be steady and situations involving both laminar and turbulent flow have been considered. The fluid properties have been assumed constant except for the density change with temperature that gives rise to the buoyancy forces, this being dealt with using the Boussinesq approach. The governing equations have been solved using the commercial CFD code ANSYS FLUENT©, the k-epsilon turbulence model having been used. The solution has the following parameters: the Rayleigh number, the Reynolds number based on the vent discharge velocity, the dimensionless depth that the window is recessed, the Prandtl number, the dimensionless top and bottom blind opening, the dimensionless size of the air vent, and the dimensionless vent discharge temperature to undisturbed air temperature difference. Results have only been obtained for a Prandtl number of 0.74 and for fixed values of the dimensionless depth that the window is recessed, the dimensionless size of the air vent, and the dimensionless vent discharge temperature difference. The effects of the other dimensionless variables on the window Nusselt number have been numerically studied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".