Electrochemical deposition of composite biopolymer films
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Composite films of alginic acid–hyaluronic acid and alginic acid–heparin were deposited by electrochemical method for the surface modification of conductive substrates. Obtained films were studied by SEM, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential thermal analysis (DTA) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The deposition yield increased with increasing concentration of hyaluronate and heparin in the alginate solutions. The results of deposition yield measurements coupled with the results of TGA and DTA studies showed the possibility of the formation of deposits of different composition. These results are in a good agreement with the FTIR data, which revealed characteristic adsorption peaks of hyaluronic acid and heparin for the composite films. Film thickness was varied in the range of 0–10 μm by the variation of the deposition time at a constant deposition voltage. Obtained films can be used for the surface modification of biomedical implants with improved biocompatibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it