MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2006704216 · doi:10.1021/jf990791s

Effect of Cationic Membrane Permselectivity on the Efficiency of Skim Milk Electroacidification

2000· article· en· W2006704216 on OpenAlexaff
Laurent Bazinet, F. Lamarche, Denis Ippersiel, Behzad Mahdavi, Jean Amiot

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Inactivation Methods
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecUniversité LavalAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemineralizationMembraneChemistrySkimmed milkSalt (chemistry)PotassiumElectrodialysisCationic polymerizationCaseinIon exchangeIonic strengthChromatographyFood scienceIonBiochemistryAqueous solutionMaterials sciencePolymer chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bipolar membrane electroacidification (BMEA) uses the property of bipolar membranes to split water and the demineralization action of cation-exchange membranes (CEM). As milk mineral salt content is very sensitive to ionic strength and pH changes, the aim of this study was to better understand the effect of changes in mineral content during pH decrease and demineralization of skim milk. The objectives were to investigate the effect of different cationic permselective membranes (CSV and CMX membranes) on skim milk cation migration and protein precipitation during BMEA. The permselectivity of both membranes tested does not influence the final efficiency of BMEA. The purity of the bovine milk casein isolates produced was similar to or higher (97-98% versus 93.4-96.7) than those of commercial isolates, due to a reduced ash content (1.2 versus 2.0-3. 8%) resulting from the CEM demineralizing phenomenon. For both membranes, the main ionic species to migrate was the potassium ions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistrySame topicMicrobial Inactivation MethodsFrench-language works237,207