Designing a Physical Locality Aware Coherence Protocol for Chip-Multiprocessors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many-core architectures provide an efficient way of harnessing the growing numbers of transistors available. However, energy and latency costs of communication increasingly limit the parallel programs running on these platforms. Existing designs provide a functional communication layer, but not necessarily the most efficient solution. Due to power limitations, efficiency is now a primary concern that motivates us to look again at cache coherence. First, we analyze the communication behavior of parallel applications. The observed sharing patterns reveal considerable locality of shared data accesses between threads with consecutive IDs. This pattern corresponds to strong physical locality between adjacent cores in a chip-multiprocessor (CMP). This paper explores the design of Proximity Coherence: a novel scheme in which L1 load misses are optimistically forwarded to nearby caches via new dedicated links. We exploit these patterns and improve the efficiency of communication. The results show that careful analysis leads to the design of a more efficient coherence protocol. The protocol reduces the latency of load misses by up to 33 percent (17 percent, on average), improving overall execution time by up to 13 percent. Furthermore, it also reduces network-on-chip traffic by 19 percent and energy consumption by up to 30 percent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it