Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For administration efficiency most countries subdivide their national territory into administrative regions. These regions are used to delineate areas which are internally well connected and relatively cohesive, especially compared with the links between regions. Hence, many countries seek to delineate local labour markets (LLMs): geographical regions where the majority of the local population seeks employment and from which the majority of local employers recruit labour. LLM boundaries are often based on functional regions, which represent the aggregate commuting patterns of the local population. A number of regionalisation procedures for objectivity delineating functional regions have been suggested, though many of these procedures require the use of ad hoc parameters to control the size and number of regions. Recently, a range of network-based alternatives have been developed in the literature. One of the most successful such methods is based on the concept of modularity: the extent to which there are dense connections within functional regions, but only sparse connections between functional regions. In this paper we maximise the modularity of a network of commuting flows to produce a regionalisation that exhibits less interaction than expected between regions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this type of regionalisation procedure on a simulated geographical network, as well as using commuting data for the Republic of Ireland. We suggest that this new method has specific advantages over existing regionalisation procedures, particularly in the context of disaggregate commuting patterns of socioeconomic subgroups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it