Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we address the rendezvous problem between an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) and a passively floating drifter on the sea surface. The AUV's mission is to keep an estimate of the floating drifter's position while exploring the underwater environment and periodically attempting to rendezvous with it. We are interested in the case where the AUV loses track of the drifter, predicts its location and searches for it in the vicinity of the predicted location. We parameterize this search problem with respect to both the uncertainty in the drifter's position estimate and the ratio between the drifter and the AUV speeds. We examine two search strategies for the AUV, an inward spiral and an outward spiral. We derive conditions under which these patterns are guaranteed to find a drifter, and we empirically analyze them with respect to different parameters in simulation. In addition, we present results from field trials in which an AUV successfully found a drifter after periods of communication loss during which the robot was exploring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it