Genetic predisposition to the cytotoxicity of arsenic: the role of DNA damage and ATM
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Arsenic is a pervasive cytotoxin and carcinogen in the environment. Although its mode of action has yet to be fully elucidated, oxidative DNA damage has been suggested. A series of DNA repair-defective human and hamster cell lines associated with sensitivity to oxidative agents were examined for their response to arsenic-induced cytotoxicity. Only the Ataxia telangiectasia (AT) cells displayed a marked hypersensitive response (greater than twofold). The protective role of the ATM protein was confirmed by the normal response to arsenic displayed by AT cells expressing wild-type ATM. Although the ATM protein plays a pivotal role in response to DNA double-strand breakage, none of the other cell lines with defects in double-strand break repair displayed a similar hypersensitivity. Further examination indicated that concentrations of sodium arsenite as high as 1 mg/l do not generate significant levels of double-strand breaks. Our data suggest that the ATM protein functions in an important but different capacity in the cellular response to arsenic toxicity than it does in response to agents that generate double-strand breaks, such as ionizing radiation. Furthermore, the lack of hypersensitivity to arsenic displayed by the other cell lines calls into question the hypothesis that DNA damage is a significant factor in arsenic cytotoxicity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it