MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008174695 · doi:10.1080/03052151003702596

Development of an inexact fuzzy flexible programming approach for environmental pollution control

2010· article· en· W2008174695 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Optimization · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMulti-Criteria Decision Making
Canadian institutionsMinistry of the Environment, Conservation and ParksSaskatchewan Ministry of AgricultureMinistry of EnvironmentUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical optimizationFuzzy logicComputer scienceControl (management)Constraint (computer-aided design)Function (biology)Operations researchRisk analysis (engineering)EngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Optimization techniques have been widely applied to solving environmental management problems, particularly for regional air quality management systems where potential air pollutions arising from improper management would seriously threaten human health. An inexact fuzzy flexible programming approach is developed to facilitate decision support for air quality management. It can tackle both stipulation uncertainty and parameter uncertainty in the objective function and constraints. Upon the previous research efforts, the most significant improvement of this approach is the introduction of multiple control variables corresponding to the objective function and all constraints. This attempt makes it possible for the constraints to be relaxed under respective levels, such that a more satisfactory objective value may be obtained. The impact of each constraint on the system outputs can also be further interpreted. The proposed approach would be helpful for such systems where the decision makers prefer to not only find out an air pollution control scheme with a satisfaction level as high as possible, but also mitigate the uncertainty in decision making. A regional air pollution control problem is then studied to demonstrate the applicability of the developed approach. A variety of management strategies for air pollutants allocation and treatment are suggested in terms of the optimal solutions to decision variables. Comparison between the optimal solutions from the proposed approach and those from a conventional fuzzy flexible programming model is undertaken. It can be found that neither the management strategies nor the priorities of pollutants allocation obtained from the two models are the same. The satisfaction level of the proposed approach (taking the average value of optimized solutions of control variables for comparison) is always higher than that of the existing approach, indicating the superiority of the proposed approach in handling many air pollution control problems. Keywords: air pollutioninexactuncertaintyfuzzy flexible programmingoptimization Acknowledgements This research was supported by the Major State Basic Research Development Program (2005CB724200 and 2006CB403307), and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it