MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008240470 · doi:10.1017/s0022112010000406

Near-wall estimates of the concentration and orientation distribution of a semi-dilute rigid fibre suspension in Poiseuille flow

2010· article· en· W2008240470 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Material Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsHagen–Poiseuille equationOrientation (vector space)PhysicsSuspension (topology)Flow (mathematics)Materials scienceDistribution functionClassical mechanicsGeometryThermodynamicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A model is presented to predict the orientation and concentration state of a semi-dilute, rigid fibre suspension in a plane channel flow. A probability distribution function is used to describe the local orientation and concentration states of the suspension and evolves according to a Fokker–Planck equation. The fibres are free to interact with each other hydrodynamically and are modelled using the approach outlined by Folgar & Tucker ( J. Reinf. Plast. Comp. vol. 3, 1984, p. 98). Near the channel walls, the no-flux boundary conditions as proposed by Schiek & Shaqfeh ( J. Fluid Mech. vol. 296, 1995, p. 271) are applied on the orientation distribution function. With this approach, geometric constraints are used to couple the fibres' rotary motion with their translational motion. This eliminates physically unrealistic orientation states in the near-wall region. The concentration distribution is modelled in a similar manner to that proposed by Ma & Graham ( Phys. Fluids vol. 17, 2005, art. 083103). A two-way coupling between the fibre orientation state and the momentum equations of the suspending fluid is considered. Experiments are performed to validate the numerical model by visualizing the motion of tracer fibres in an index-of-refraction matched suspension. The orientation distribution function is determined experimentally based on these observations of fibre motion and a comparison is made with the model predictions. Good agreement is shown particularly near the channel walls. The results indicate that at distances less than one-half of a fibre length from the channel walls, the model accurately predicts the available fibre orientation states and the distribution of fibres amongst these states. The model further predicts a large concentration gradient in this region that is also observed experimentally. The magnitude of the concentration gradient in the near-wall region is shown to increase with increasing fibre concentration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it