MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008594023 · doi:10.1109/isita.2010.5649565

Using synchronization bits to boost compression by substring enumeration

2010· article· en· W2008594023 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSubstringLossless compressionComputer scienceEnumerationByteSynchronization (alternating current)Binary numberAlgorithmPreprocessorData compressionSimple (philosophy)Data structureTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsArithmeticArtificial intelligenceDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new lossless data compression technique called compression via substring enumeration (CSE) has recently been introduced. It has been observed that CSE achieves lower performance on binary data. An hypothesis has been formulated that suggests that CSE loses track of the position of the bits relative to the byte boundaries more easily in binary data and that this confusion incurs a penalty for CSE. This paper questions the validity of the hypothesis and proposes a simple technique to reduce the penalty, in case the hypothesis is correct. The technique consists in adding a preprocessing step that inserts synchronization bits in the data in order to boost the performance of CSE. Experiments provide strong evidence that the formulated hypothesis is true and they demonstrate the effectiveness of the use of synchronization bits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAlgorithms and Data CompressionFrench-language works237,207