Atomistic simulation methodologies for modelling the nucleation, growth and structure of interfaces
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There have been many studies applying atomistic simulation techniques to investigate the structure and energetics of surfaces and interfaces. Almost all start by defining the basic structure of the interface, which is then simulated by static or dynamical methods. A different approach is adopted here, where we allow interfacial structures to evolve during the course of the simulation. In particular, three atomistic simulation methodologies for constructing models for thin film interfaces have been developed, including `atom deposition', where the thin film is `grown' by sequentially depositing atoms onto a support material to obtain information on nucleation and growth mechanisms; `layer-by-layer' growth, where monatomic layers of a material are successively deposited on top of a substrate surface; and finally, `cube-on-cube' whereby the whole of the thin film is placed directly on top of the substrate, before dynamical simulation and energy minimisation. The methodologies developed in this study provide a basis for simulating the nucleation, growth and structure of interface systems ranging from small supported clusters to monolayer and multilayer thin film interfaces. In addition, the layer-by-layer methodology is ideally suited to explore the critical thickness of thin films. We illustrate these techniques with studies on systems with large negative misfits. The calculations suggest that the thin films (initially constrained under tension due to the misfit) relax back to their natural lattice parameter resulting in the formation of surface cracks and island formation. The cube-on-cube methodology was then applied to the SrO/MgO system, which has a large (+20%) positive misfit. For this system, the SrO thin film underwent an amorphous transition which, under prolonged dynamical simulation, recrystallised revealing misfit-induced structural modifications, including screw-edge dislocations and low angle lattice rotations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it