MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Exploration of Narrative Inquiry into Multiculturalism in Education: Reflecting on Two Decades of Research in an Inner-City Canadian Community School

2003· article· en· W2008779852 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurriculum Inquiry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismNarrativeMulticultural educationSociologyNarrative inquiryMeaning (existential)DemocracyPedagogyGender studiesEpistemologyPolitical sciencePoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article we explore the connection between multicultural education and narrative inquiry. We trace the history of multiculturalism as a form of public discourse in Canadian social life. With this as background we consider life in an inner-city Canadian school as a microcosm of Canadian social life more generally. Following the ebb and flow of 20 years of narrative inquiry in this Canadian inner-city school, we realize that this inquiry, though defined in various terms, is ultimately a study of multicultural life. We argue that an understanding of multicultural life as a democratic life process is central to an understanding of the social purposes of multiculturalism. We believe that multicultural education and narrative inquiry have the potential for profoundly productive links in the pursuit of democratic life. We conclude by puzzling over the meaning of multicultural inquiry and of the significance of cross-cultural studies for understanding multicultural life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.562
GPT teacher head0.589
Teacher spread0.027 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it