An enhanced microfluidic chip coupled to an electrospray Qstar mass spectrometer for protein identification
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The combination of microfabricated fluidic systems (muFAB) and electrospray mass spectrometers (ESI-MS) will provide multiplexed and integrated analytical systems for proteins and other biomolecules. Implementation of this novel approach requires the development of robust and user-friendly muFAB devices. Here, we present new approaches that improve the robustness, user friendliness and performance of muFAB devices coupled to MS. First, we present the development of a convenient mount to connect a muFAB device to the ESI-MS and the incorporation of filters in the reservoirs and exit of the muFAB. This mount facilitates interfacing and significantly reduces the chemical noise observed by the MS. Furthermore, we demonstrate improvements in sample handling and delivery by using either a nonaqueous electrolyte or a cationic coating on the surfaces in the muFAB device and transfer capillary. These improvements are applied to protein analysis by continuous infusion of proteolytic digests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it