MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2008873983 · doi:10.1137/130913158

Weak Convergence Methods for Approximation of the Evaluation of Path-Dependent Functionals

2013· article· en· W2008873983 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Control and Optimization · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsSequence (biology)Weak convergenceConvergence (economics)Applied mathematicsMarkov chainProjection (relational algebra)Path (computing)Mathematical optimizationAlgorithmComputer scienceQueue

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In many applications, one needs to evaluate a path-dependent objective functional $V$ associated with a continuous-time stochastic process $X$. Due to the nonlinearity and possible lack of Markovian property, more often than not, $V$ cannot be evaluated analytically, and only Monte Carlo simulation or numerical approximation is possible. In addition, such calculations often require the handling of stopping times, the usual dynamic programming approach may fall apart, and the continuity of the functional becomes the main issue. Denoting by $h$ the stepsize of the approximation sequence, this work develops a numerical scheme so that an approximating sequence of path-dependent functionals $V^h$ converges to $V$. By a natural division of labors, the main task is divided into two parts. Given a sequence $X^h$ that converges weakly to $X$, the first part provides sufficient conditions for the convergence of the sequence of path-dependent functionals $V^h$ to $V$. The second part constructs a sequence of approximations $X^h$ using Markov chain approximation methods and demonstrates the weak convergence of $X^h$ to $X$, when $X$ is the solution of a stochastic differential equation. As a demonstration, combining the results of the two parts above, approximation of option pricing for the discrete-monitoring-barrier option underlying stochastic volatility model is provided. Different from the existing literature, the weak convergence analysis is carried out by using the Skorohod topology together with the continuous mapping theorem. The advantage of this approach is that the functional under study may be a function of stopping times, projection of the underlying diffusion on a sequence of random times, and/or maximum/minimum of the underlying diffusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it