MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009188139 · doi:10.1159/000085983

Induction of Reproducible Focal Ischemic Lesions in Neonatal Mice by Photothrombosis

2005· article· en· W2009188139 on OpenAlexafffund
Kimberley A. Maxwell, Richard H. Dyck

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Neuroscience · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Stroke Network
KeywordsCortex (anatomy)IschemiaSomatosensory systemMedicineCerebral cortexStroke (engine)NeurosciencePathologyAnesthesiaBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Focal stroke during the perinatal and neonatal period is a significant cause of cognitive and behavioral deficits. Currently, the number of models available to study neonatal brain injury is limited and many are technically difficult to induce in neonatal rodents. We demonstrate a reproducible method to induce a focal ischemic injury in the cerebral cortex of neonatal mice that utilizes the principle of photothrombosis. Postnatal day 7 pups were anesthetized and systemically administered rose bengal (50 mg/kg). Permanent focal ischemia was induced in the medial frontal cortex and somatosensory cortex by irradiating surface blood vessels with a laser (532 nm). By placing a mask having an aperture of defined shape and size on the skull surface, we were able to reliably and reproducibly induce infarcts in discretely defined cortical regions. Further, we demonstrate explicit control of infarct volume by modifying the duration of laser exposure. This tool will provide a means for researchers to safely, easily and noninvasively induce reproducible ischemic lesions in specified regions of the neonatal cortex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental NeuroscienceSame topicNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyFrench-language works237,207