MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009199723 · doi:10.1097/opx.0b013e318163976a

A New Generation of Optometric Educators and Researchers on Parade

2008· article· en· W2009199723 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anthony J. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueOptometry and Vision Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicResearch, Science, and Academia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipParadeGenerosityOptometryMedical educationOphthalmologyMedicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A profession looks to its newest members for the future and at the American Academy of Optometry annual meeting in Tampa in October 2007 there was an impressive line up of candidate educator and research leaders at hand. In large part the early identification of the upcoming generation of educators and researchers has been made possible by the generosity of the profession and its industry friends through the American Optometric Foundation (AOF). AOF is experiencing dramatic and exciting growth and is an increasingly innovative presence in optometry. It supports education and research through a number of programs, and there were some interesting examples of how this impacts the profession that were quite evident at the 2007 annual meeting. The Carl Zeiss AOF Fellows program debuted in 2007 as a result of a creative and generous partnership of Carl Zeiss Vision and AOF. The program identifies one optometry student at each school and college of optometry in the U.S., Canada, and Puerto Rico, awards them a $5000 Fellowship, and brings them to optometry's premier education and research meeting (the annual meeting of the American Academy of Optometry). It then brings them back the following year for a Fellows reunion and is funded by Carl Zeiss Vision. The Fellowship Awards are made by AOF using FAAO reviewer input from across North America. As AOF President Mark Bullimore, OD, PhD, FAAO noted, as he spoke to these Fellows, “People are still talking about meeting you all at the Academy Meeting. You were fabulous ambassadors for your institution and for the future of optometry. On behalf of the Foundation, the Academy, and Carl Zeiss Vision, I want to say how proud we are of your achievements and how excited we are about the future.” The program was the brainchild of Mike Morris of Carl Zeiss Vision working with the Mark Bullimore. Mike can be seen with his “inaugural fellows” in Fig. 1. This is likely a ‘class' that yields star educators of the future; it certainly has tapped some impressive optometric talent.FIGURE 1.: AOF-Carl Ziess Vision AOF Fellows 2007, with Michael Morris, OD and Fred Howard of Carl Zeiss Vision.Another ‘team' at the annual meeting was the AOF Ezell Fellows. These fellows are typically optometrists who have already made a commitment to an optometric career in research and discovery by working toward a PhD research degree. They are certainly the cream of the crop in terms of their successful competition for each Fellowship; for every Fellowship Award there were close to four top notch applicants! The Academy Research Committee, led by Gunilla Haegerstrom-Portnoy, OD, PhD, FAAO each year, reviews mounds of fine applications and seems more impressed each year with the caliber of those headed down this career path. They make impassioned pleas for increased support to AOF allowing funding of a greater number of optometry's most talented and promising clinician researchers and research trainees. At the AOF Celebration luncheon in Tampa this Ezell team lined up with President Mark Bullimore and received the appreciation and obvious pride in their achievements from an overflow audience (Fig. 2). Attendees were impressed with the big jump in AOF support over the past year ($750,000 increase), giving the Foundation an almost $3 million portfolio of funds allowing $300,000 in Awards to be distributed annually.FIGURE 2.: Ezell Fellows 2007, with AOF President Mark A. Bullimore, OD, PhD, FAAO.And yet a third example of a 2007 team of promising colleagues at the Academy meeting were those attending the Academy's inaugural Residents Day program sponsored by CooperVision. It featured 24 case presentations and lively discussions among residents, faculty and colleagues. While these are distinct ‘classes' or cohorts with a common distinction, there were also many other student participants at Tampa who were thrilled to interact with hundreds of students, and the thousands of optometrists, Academy Fellows, and leading educators and researchers in optometry. Their enthusiasm was palpable. Above four Illinois College of Optometry students were encouraged by Irv Borish, OD, FAAO as they proudly presented their poster (Fig. 3).FIGURE 3.: Dr Irvin M. Borish, OD, FAAO visits with Illinois College of Optometry students.This next generation of educators, researchers, and first rate clinician practitioners witnessed tremendous and inspiring leadership presentations. For example, how could they not have been inspired by the stunning and ground breaking research presentations of both the Charles F. Prentice Medalist and Glenn A. Fry Awardees, Judah Folkman, MD and Christine Wildsoet, OD, PhD, FAAO, respectively? They are seen at the Awards session of the Academy meeting (Figs. 4 and 5).FIGURE 4.: Judah Folkman, MD, delivers 2007 Charles F. Prentice Lecture: AAO 2007.FIGURE 5.: Christine Wildsoet, OD, PhD, FAAO receives AOF 2007 Glenn A. Fry Award.If optometry's future is to be measured by the pool of young talent that was evident at Tampa, then it has a very bright future indeed! Anthony J. Adams Editor-in-Chief Berkeley, California

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.006
Scholarly communication0.0150.018
Open science0.0020.014
Research integrity0.0080.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0970.046

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.269
GPT teacher head0.582
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptometry and Vision ScienceSame topicResearch, Science, and AcademiaFrench-language works237,207