MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2009347928 · doi:10.2310/7750.2009.08072

Ethyl Chloride Spray for Sensory Relief for Botulinum Toxin Injections of the Hands and Feet

2009· article· en· W2009347928 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthyl ChlorideMedicineBotulinum toxinAnesthesiaInjection siteSurgeryIce creamFood scienceBiomedical engineeringChemistryNuclear chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin injections are effective in the treatment of palmar and plantar hyperhidrosis, but discomfort has limited its use. OBJECTIVE: To study the use of ethyl chloride medium-stream spray in reducing injection discomfort. METHODS: We used ethyl chloride medium-stream spray, in conjunction with precooling by frozen ice packs, in our No Sweat Clinic for our most recent 51 consecutive cases of botulinum toxin injection. RESULTS: Ethyl chloride spray greatly facilitated the injection procedure, and all patients completed the injections without hesitation or delay. CONCLUSION: Ethyl chloride medium-stream spray, in conjunction with precooling by frozen ice packs, is highly effective in reducing painful injection sensations. Its use is safe, economical, and easy to learn and does not require special equipment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it